No items found.
Event

After Mythos: Closing the Gap Between Detection and Remediation

Date
On Demand
Event Type
On-Demand Webinar

In 2018, the mean time-to-exploit for a new vulnerability was 2.3 years. In 2026, it's under 20 hours. Mythos is just a signpost on what we’ve been observing for years: the exploit window is collapsing, and the controls that worked a year ago are no longer able to close it fast enough.

Most AppSec programs were built for a more manageable pace: find vulnerabilities, file tickets, and remediate in 30 days under the most stringent SLAs. That model made sense when attackers needed months, not hours. The gap between finding and fixing is where exploits live, and the only way to close it is to fix at the same speed as attackers. 

In this webinar, we break down how to close that gap using reachability-based prioritization, upgrade impact analysis, backported patches, and agentic remediation workflows.

We cover:

  • Prioritize what's reachable and exploitable: Not every vulnerability is exploitable in the context of your application. Reachability analysis lets you cut through the noise and focus remediation on the flaws that are actually reachable and exploitable in your code and architecture.
  • Upgrade with confidence, not crossed fingers: Upgrading a vulnerable dependency shouldn't mean gambling on regressions. Upgrade impact analysis shows you what will break before the pull request opens
  • Patch what you can't upgrade: Some dependencies can't be bumped without breaking production. Endor Patches backports security fixes to the version already running, with no version bump, no breaking changes, and no regressions.
  • Agentic remediation at machine speed: AURI Agents by Endor Labs are pre-built, context-grounded AppSec agents that close the finding-to-fixing gap. They propose safe upgrades, generate backported patches, and open pull requests, all without breaking the build, and in hours, not sprint cycles.
  • Measurable outcomes from teams that have made the shift: 6x faster CVE remediation and 83% fewer blocked PRs across organizations including Atlassian, Cursor, Dropbox, Robinhood, Rubrik, and Snowflake.
GPT-6.1 Sol on Codex: Astra-level security, a third faster, zero cheating
Nine days after GPT-6 Sol, Codex with GPT-6.1 Sol scores 77.7% FuncPass and 34.1% SecPass — within one task of GPT-6 Astra on security, a third faster, and with zero confirmed cheating.
Read more
GPT-6 Sol on Codex: average scores, quarter the cost
Codex with GPT-6 Sol scores 72.1% FuncPass and 25.1% SecPass for $104 on Azure — 78% cheaper than Astra ($468) — with zero confirmed cheating.
Read more
Opus 5.5: 6x cheaper and 2x faster than Fable 5.1, but only 33.5% of code is secure
Claude Code with Opus 5.5 finishes coding tasks in a median of 2.2 minutes for $116 in total, the fastest run on our board and the cheapest Anthropic run by far, but lands at only 33.5% for secure code.
Read more
GPT-6.1 Sol on Codex: Astra-level security, a third faster, zero cheating
Nine days after GPT-6 Sol, Codex with GPT-6.1 Sol scores 77.7% FuncPass and 34.1% SecPass — within one task of GPT-6 Astra on security, a third faster, and with zero confirmed cheating.
Read more
GPT-6 Sol on Codex: average scores, quarter the cost
Codex with GPT-6 Sol scores 72.1% FuncPass and 25.1% SecPass for $104 on Azure — 78% cheaper than Astra ($468) — with zero confirmed cheating.
Read more
Opus 5.5: 6x cheaper and 2x faster than Fable 5.1, but only 33.5% of code is secure
Claude Code with Opus 5.5 finishes coding tasks in a median of 2.2 minutes for $116 in total, the fastest run on our board and the cheapest Anthropic run by far, but lands at only 33.5% for secure code.
Read more

Want to stay in the loop?

Sign up for our newsletter.