Get a Demo

Let's Patch It!

Book a short call with one our specialists, we'll walk you through how Endor Patches work, and ask you a few questions about your environment (like your primary programming languages and repository management). We'll also send you an email right after you fill out the form, feel free to reply with any questions you have in advance!

CVE

CVE-2024-24563

Vyper array negative index vulnerability
Back to all
CVE

CVE-2024-24563

Vyper array negative index vulnerability

Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. Arrays can be keyed by a signed integer, while they are defined for unsigned integers only. The typechecker doesn't throw when spotting the usage of an int as an index for an array. The typechecker allows the usage of signed integers to be used as indexes to arrays. The vulnerability is present in different forms in all versions, including 0.3.10. For ints, the 2's complement representation is used. Because the array was declared very large, the bounds checking will pass Negative values will simply be represented as very large numbers. As of time of publication, a fixed version does not exist.

There are three potential vulnerability classes: unpredictable behavior, accessing inaccessible elements and denial of service. Class 1: If it is possible to index an array with a negative integer without reverting, this is most likely not anticipated by the developer and such accesses can cause unpredictable behavior for the contract. Class 2: If a contract has an invariant in the form assert index < x, the developer will suppose that no elements on indexes y | y >= x are accessible. However, by using negative indexes, this can be bypassed. Class 3: If the index is dependent on the state of the contract, this poses a risk of denial of service. If the state of the contract can be manipulated in such way that the index will be forced to be negative, the array access can always revert (because most likely the array won't be declared extremely large). However, all these the scenarios are highly unlikely. Most likely behavior is a revert on the bounds check.

Package Versions Affected

Package Version
patch Availability
No items found.

Automatically patch vulnerabilities without upgrading

Fix Without Upgrading
Detect compatible fix
Apply safe remediation
Fix with a single pull request

CVSS Version

Severity
Base Score
CVSS Version
Score Vector
C
H
U
9.8
-
3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
C
H
U
0
-
3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
C
H
U
-

Related Resources

No items found.

References

https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2024/24xxx/CVE-2024-24563.json, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/a1fd228cb9936c3e4bbca6f3ee3fb4426ef45490/vyper/codegen/core.py#L534-L541, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/c150fc49ee9375a930d177044559b83cb95f7963/vyper/semantics/types/subscriptable.py#L127-L137, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-52xq-j7v9-v4v2, https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-24563

Severity

9.8

CVSS Score
0
10

Basic Information

Ecosystem
Base CVSS
9.8
EPSS Probability
0.00176%
EPSS Percentile
0.39055%
Introduced Version
0
Fix Available

Fix Critical Vulnerabilities Instantly

Secure your app without upgrading.
Fix Without Upgrading