Get a Demo

Let's Patch It!

Book a short call with one our specialists, we'll walk you through how Endor Patches work, and ask you a few questions about your environment (like your primary programming languages and repository management). We'll also send you an email right after you fill out the form, feel free to reply with any questions you have in advance!

CVE

GHSA-892r-p3jq-jp24

PraisonAI: AgentOS remains unauthenticated after incomplete fix version and allows remote agent invocation
Back to all
CVE

GHSA-892r-p3jq-jp24

PraisonAI: AgentOS remains unauthenticated after incomplete fix version and allows remote agent invocation

AgentOS remains unauthenticated after GHSA-pm96 patched version and allows remote agent invocation

Summary

PraisonAI's AgentOS FastAPI deployment surface remains unauthenticated in

current main and in releases after the published patched version for

GHSA-pm96-6xpr-978x / CVE-2026-40151.

The public AgentOS advisory is published as an instruction-disclosure issue

with affected versions < 4.5.128 and patched version 4.5.128. However,

v4.5.128, latest release v4.6.57, and current main still register

GET /api/agents and POST /api/chat without authentication. The chat route

directly calls agent.chat(request.message). No-auth and wrong-bearer requests

both execute the deployed agent.

This is broader than passive metadata disclosure. In any deployment where

AgentOS wraps agents with tools, private context, memory, API integrations, or

cost-bearing model calls, an unauthenticated reachable client can drive those

agents.

Affected Product

  • Repository: MervinPraison/PraisonAI
  • Package: praisonai
  • Component: src/praisonai/praisonai/app/agentos.py
  • Config component: src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/app/config.py
  • Public advisory incomplete-fix reference: GHSA-pm96-6xpr-978x /

  CVE-2026-40151

Confirmed affected dynamically:

  • v4.5.126
  • v4.5.128 (published patched version for GHSA-pm96-6xpr-978x)
  • v4.6.9
  • v4.6.10
  • v4.6.56
  • v4.6.57
  • current main 2f9677abb2ea68eab864ee8b6a828fd0141612e1

Static source review found the same unauthenticated route pattern and

0.0.0.0 default in v4.2.1.

Suggested affected range: >= 4.2.1, <= 4.6.57.

Root Cause

AgentOSConfig / AgentAppConfig defaults the deployment host to all

interfaces and has no authentication fields:

name: str = "PraisonAI App"
host: str = "0.0.0.0"
port: int = 8000
api_prefix: str = "/api"

AgentOS.registerroutes() registers public agent metadata and chat routes

without middleware, dependency, API key check, bearer-token check, or startup

fail-closed guard:

@app.get(f"{self.config.api_prefix}/agents")
async def list_agents():
    return {"agents": [...]}
@app.post(f"{self.config.api_prefix}/chat", response_model=ChatResponse)
async def chat(request: ChatRequest):
    ...
    response = agent.chat(request.message)

A wrong Authorization header is ignored because the route does not inspect it.

Current main also has a root-export bug where from praisonai import AgentOS

raises ImportError, but this does not mitigate the issue. The same class

remains reachable through from praisonai import AgentApp and

from praisonai.app import AgentOS.

Why This Is Not Intended Behavior

PraisonAI's security documentation says API servers were hardened so anonymous

requests return 401 and default binding changed from 0.0.0.0 to

127.0.0.1 after the prior unauthenticated API server class.

The API Server Authentication docs say bearer auth is enabled by default,

disabling auth is not recommended for production, and 0.0.0.0 should be used

only behind an authenticating proxy.

The local PoV includes a hardened sibling control for the generated deploy API

on current main. It returns:

  • no auth: 401
  • wrong bearer: 401
  • correct bearer: 200

AgentOS remains outside that control plane and still accepts no-auth and

wrong-bearer /api/chat requests.

Local PoV

The PoV is local-only. It uses FastAPI's in-process test client, a stub agent,

and a temporary file side effect. It does not start a network listener, call an

LLM provider, or contact any external service.

Command:

env PYTHONPATH="artifacts/repos/praisonai-current/src/praisonai:artifacts/repos/praisonai-current/src/praisonai-agents" \
  uv run --with fastapi --with httpx --with flask --with flask-cors \
    --with pydantic --with typing-extensions --with rich --with python-dotenv \
    submission-bundle/praisonai-prai-cand-007-agentos-incomplete-auth-fix/poc/prai_cand_007_agentos_incomplete_auth_fix.py \
    --repo artifacts/repos/praisonai-current \
    --label current-head

Current-head result summary:

{
  "describe": "v4.6.57-4-g2f9677ab",
  "head": "2f9677abb2ea68eab864ee8b6a828fd0141612e1",
  "agentos_vulnerable": true,
  "entrypoints": [
    {
      "entrypoint": "agentapp_alias",
      "statuses": [200, 200, 200],
      "side_effects": ["no-auth-marker", "wrong-bearer-marker"]
    },
    {
      "entrypoint": "direct_agentos",
      "statuses": [200, 200, 200],
      "side_effects": ["no-auth-marker", "wrong-bearer-marker"]
    }
  ],
  "deploy_api_control": {
    "control_passed": true,
    "statuses": [401, 401, 200]
  }
}

The three AgentOS statuses are for:

  • unauthenticated GET /api/agents;
  • unauthenticated POST /api/chat;
  • wrong-bearer POST /api/chat.

The side-effect list proves both unauthenticated chat requests invoked the

agent method.

Minimal inline reproducer:

from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from praisonai import AgentApp
from praisonaiagents import AgentOSConfig
class StubAgent:
    name = "pov_agentos_agent"
    role = "tester"
    instructions = "private instruction marker"
    def __init__(self, out):
        self.out = out
    def chat(self, message):
        self.out.write_text(self.out.read_text() + message + "\n")
        return "PRAI_CAND_007_AGENTOS_EXECUTED:" + message
with TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
    side_effect = Path(tmp) / "side_effects.txt"
    side_effect.write_text("")
    app = AgentApp(
        agents=[StubAgent(side_effect)],
        config=AgentOSConfig(host="0.0.0.0", port=8000),
    )
    client = TestClient(app.get_app())
    assert client.get("/api/agents").status_code == 200
    assert client.post("/api/chat", json={"message": "no-auth"}).status_code == 200
    assert client.post(
        "/api/chat",
        headers={"Authorization": "Bearer definitely-wrong"},
        json={"message": "wrong-bearer"},
    ).status_code == 200
    assert side_effect.read_text().splitlines() == ["no-auth", "wrong-bearer"]

Version Sweep

| Target | Result |

| --- | --- |

v4.5.126 | vulnerable |

v4.5.128 | vulnerable |

v4.6.9 | vulnerable |

v4.6.10 | vulnerable |

v4.6.56 | vulnerable; generated deploy API control returns 401/401/200 |

v4.6.57 | vulnerable; generated deploy API control returns 401/401/200 |

| current 2f9677abb | vulnerable; generated deploy API control returns 401/401/200 |

Evidence files are retained locally under the bundle's evidence/ directory

and can be provided if useful.

Duplicate / Incomplete-Fix Notes

This report is related to GHSA-pm96-6xpr-978x / CVE-2026-40151. The

published advisory describes AgentOS instruction disclosure and lists

4.5.128 as patched. It also mentions unauthenticated /api/chat as a chained

instruction-extraction path.

The current report should be treated as an incomplete fix / affected-range

correction with a broader demonstrated impact:

  • the published patched version v4.5.128 still reproduces;
  • latest release v4.6.57 still reproduces;
  • current main still reproduces;
  • the PoV proves unauthorized agent invocation and side effects, not only

  instruction disclosure.

This is distinct from private PRAI-CAND-003 / GHSA-x8cv-xmq7-p8xp, which

covers praisonaiagents.AgentTeam.launch() routes. This report covers

praisonai.app.AgentOS and AgentApp alias routes.

Impact

If an operator exposes an AgentOS app on a reachable interface, any client that

can reach it can:

  • enumerate deployed agents through GET /api/agents;
  • read agent names, roles, and instruction snippets;
  • invoke the default agent or a named agent through POST /api/chat;
  • trigger downstream tools, private context reads, memory accesses, API

  integrations, browser actions, or other side effects attached to the agent;

  • consume model/API budget through repeated invocation.

The exact downstream impact depends on the deployed agents. The framework-level

boundary failure is that a production deployment surface exposes agent control

without authentication and defaults to binding on all interfaces.

Suggested Fix

Use the same security model already applied to generated API deployments:

  • add authentication fields to AgentOSConfig / AgentAppConfig;
  • default auth to enabled;
  • default bind host to 127.0.0.1;
  • reject no-auth and wrong-bearer requests for GET /api/agents and

  POST /api/chat;

  • fail closed for non-loopback binds unless auth is configured or an explicit

  unsafe development opt-out is set;

  • avoid returning instruction text from unauthenticated metadata endpoints;
  • add regression tests for no auth, wrong bearer, correct bearer, and external

  bind without auth.

Maintainers can either update GHSA-pm96-6xpr-978x with the corrected affected

range and broader impact or publish a separate incomplete-fix advisory.

Suggested Severity

Suggested severity: Critical.

The Critical score matches the unauthenticated agent-control model: network

attacker, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high

deployment-dependent impact when agents are connected to tools, private data,

or cost-bearing services. If maintainers score only a minimal no-tool demo

agent, the impact may be lower, but the current default framework behavior is

still unauthenticated agent invocation.

Package Versions Affected

Package Version
patch Availability
No items found.

Automatically patch vulnerabilities without upgrading

Fix Without Upgrading
Detect compatible fix
Apply safe remediation
Fix with a single pull request

CVSS Version

Severity
Base Score
CVSS Version
Score Vector
C
H
U
-
C
H
U
0
-
3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
C
H
U
-

Related Resources

No items found.

References

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-892r-p3jq-jp24, https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI

Severity

9.8

CVSS Score
0
10

Basic Information

Base CVSS
9.8
EPSS Probability
0%
EPSS Percentile
0%
Introduced Version
4.2.1
Fix Available
4.6.59

Fix Critical Vulnerabilities Instantly

Secure your app without upgrading.
Fix Without Upgrading