Stop fixing false positives for FedRAMP

Satisfy your 3PAO and meet SLAs without the hassle of remediating things you know aren’t real risks.

Welcome to the resistance
Oops! Something went wrong, please try again.
4.9 (G2 Reviews)

Stop fixing false positives for FedRAMP

Satisfy your 3PAO and meet SLAs without the hassle of remediating things you know aren’t real risks.

Loved by security teams, painless for developers at:

How it works

1

3PAOs accept Endor Labs’ reachability analysis as evidence false positives

2

Reduce double filings by correlating SCA and container scans

3

Patch vulnerabilities within 30 days using Endor Patches, 6.2x faster than the 187 day average

Without the tedium and minutia of tracking down individual items that might not matter, we can focus on the remaining vulnerabilities that would impact customers and our FedRAMP compliance."

Without the tedium and minutia of tracking down individual items that might not matter, we can focus on the remaining vulnerabilities that would impact customers and our FedRAMP compliance."

Raphael Theberge

Head of Security Enablement at Relativity

Step 1: Identify false positives

Control costs by proving false positives to your 3PAO

Endor Labs reduces the cost of continuous monitoring (ConMon) by clearly identifying false positives in a way that will be accepted by 3PAOs.  Since false positives make up 70-80% of SCA findings, this is a huge opportunity for cost control.

Book a Demo
Start a Trial

Step 2: Consolidate scanners

Meet container requirements without duplicate work

Endor Labs consolidates container and SCA findings into a single view, highlighting the unique vulnerabilities and eliminating double filings. Meet FedRAMP container requirements by scanning in pipelines and registries, and by signing artifacts to prevent unauthorized deployments.

Book a Demo
Start a Trial

Step 3: Remediate

Achieve SLAs by fixing 6.2x faster

Use EPSS to get level adjustments so you have longer to remediate lower risk findings. Upgrade impact analysis provides remediation options that are easiest for engineering to execute without breaking changes. Mitigate vulnerabilities in less than 30 days with an Endor Patch.

Book a Demo
Start a Trial
Book a Demo
Start a Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

Doesn’t FedRAMP require that we fix everything anyway?

That’s a common misconception! The good news is, FedRAMP does not require you to remediate false positives, so long as you can prove that’s what they are. 

Our reachability analysis has been evaluated by top tier 3PAOs and the FedRAMP PMO. They determined it meets their standards for false positive identification. This blog by Fortreum talks about the subject, and how you can use reachability analysis to reduce your ConMon burden: Controlling FedRAMP Vulnerability Management Costs: An Auditor’s Analysis.

‍

How can I identify false positives with sufficient evidence for our 3PAO?

Identifying and Tracking FedRAMP False Positives goes over some of the requirements and explains what we do to help with this effort. We also have a short video, How to Reduce FedRAMP Workloads with Reachability, that provides an overview.

How can I avoid double filings between by SCA and container scanner?

Double fillings are a common FedRAMP problem because SCA and container scanners usually run at different parts of the SDLC. This blog talks about how we can help with container scanning requirements, including correlating SCA with container findings so you don’t chase ghosts: Achieving FedRAMP’s Container Scanning Requirements.